Le neuro-oncologue suisse Andreas Hottinger répond aux questions les plus courantes :
L’utilisation du téléphone portable augmente-t-elle le risque de cancer?
Dr Andréas Hottinger |
Vivre près d’une ligne à haute tension peut-il provoquer des cancers?
A ce jour, aucune étude sérieuse ne le démontre.
Notre commentaire
Nous sommes très fâchés que ces soi-disant "spécialistes" continuent de minimiser les risques des radiofréquences émises par les téléphones mobiles et autres technologies sans fil, et ainsi trompent les utilisateurs, les laissant croire qu'il n'y aucune raison d'appliquer le principe de précaution, en réduisant l'exposition aux ondes.
Le Dr Hottinger est membre de plusieurs associations pour la recherche et le traitement du cancer, une activité très lucrative. On a essayé d'identifier la source de financement de ces associaitons, par exemple l'European Society for Medical Oncology - plus de sources de financement par les entreprises pharmaceutiques?
http://www.esmo.org/About-Us/How-We-Work/ESMO-Funding/2016-Funding-Sources -
Est-ce qu'on peut pardonner les spécialistes comme le Dr Hottinger pour être trop occupé de faire attention aux études publiées par exemple par le Dr Lennart Hardell, qui montrent une augmentation de l'incidence des tumeurs cérébrales? On voulait envoyer au Dr Hottinger la liste de ces études (voir ci.dessous).
Le Dr Hottinger minimise aussi les risques pour la santé de la technologie 5G. Il n'est probablement pas au courant de l'Appel des centaines de scientifiques, médecins et experts du monde entier sur les effets sur la santé de la 5G.
On peut critiquer une publication populaire comme l'Illustré pour avoir cité seulement l'avis d'un tel expert comme le Dr Hottinger à l'occasion de la Journée Mondiale Contre le Cancer. La veille, le même magazine a publié un article "Les avancées médicales sur le cancer" : "Trois professeurs spécialisés décryptent l’état des recherches pour les cancers les plus répandus en Suisse" : sein, poumon et prostate, ne parlant que du traitement de ces cancers : chirurgie, radiothérapie, chimiothérapie, hormonothérapie et immunothérapie, tous des traitements qui enrichissent l'industrie du cancer - sans aucune mention de la prévention. Le mauvais usage d'un téléphone mobile, en le tenant en contact avec la peau, dans un soutien-gorge par exemple, peut jouer un rôle dans l'apparence d'un cancer du sein. Quel professionnel de santé nous rappelle des usages sécuritaires des téléphones portables?
Il est temps que nous nous réveillons et interpeller les médias et surtout les experts, pour qu'ils racontent la vérité sur de graves problèmes de santé publique. Oui, "Distinguons le vrai du faux!"
Études de recherche sur les radiations de téléphones cellulaires clés compilées par
Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley
http://www.saferemr.com
October 6, 2017
Note: This is not intended to be a comprehensive list.
National Toxicology Program (2016) Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD Rats (Whole Body Exposure). http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/06/23/055699 (see http://bit.ly/NTPsaferemr)
National Toxicology Program Draft Technical Reports – 2 February 2018
TR-595: NTP Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation (Rats)
TR-596: NTP Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation (Mice)
Tumor risk review papers
Myung et al (2009) Mobile phone use and risk of tumors: a meta-analysis. http://1.usa.gov/12wBOmd
Khurana et al (2009) Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including long-term epidemiologic data. http://1.usa.gov/1jel7s0
Levis et al (2011) Mobile phones and head tumours: the discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epi studies-how do they arise. http://1.usa.gov/1gzK8vl
Levis et al (2012) Mobile phones and head tumours: a critical analysis of case-control epi studies. http://bit.ly/1rA9aTM
WHO (2013) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 102: Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. http://bit.ly/10oIE3o
Morgan et al (2015) Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (Review). http://1.usa.gov/1EqL1DF
Wang Y, Guo X (2016) Meta-analysis of association between mobile phone use and glioma risk. http://bit.ly/2o1dVcn
Bortkiewicz et al (2017) Mobile phone use and risk of intracranial tumors and salivary gland tumors - A meta-analysis. http://bit.ly/2nVJC5d
Prasad et al (2017) Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes. http://bit.ly/cellphonebraintumor
Carlberg, Hardell (2017) Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford Hill viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation. http://bit.ly/2p1ovBU
Also see Long-Term Cell Phone Use Increases Brain Tumor Risk
Tumor risk studies
Interphone Study Group (2010) Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile phone use: results of the Interphone international case-control study. http://1.usa.gov/IBm2nJ
Interphone Study Group (2011) Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. http://1.usa.gov/18CRSNA
Aydin et al (2011) Mobile phone use & brain tumors in children & adolescents: a multi-center case-control study. http://1.usa.gov/1baLADg
Hardell et al (2013) Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use. http://1.usa.gov/1c7WF4T
Hardell et al (2013) Pooled analysis of case-control studies on acoustic neuroma diagnosed 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 and use of mobile and cordless phones. http://1.usa.gov/1iu2ORM
Coureau et al (2014) Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study. http://bit.ly/1DWgzRi
Grell et al (2016) The intracranial distribution of gliomas in relation to exposure from mobile phones: Analyses from the INTERPHONE Study. http://bit.ly/2emIZjz
Acoustic neuroma risk and cell phone use studies
Also see: http://www.saferemr.com/2016/05/should-cellphones-have-warning-labels_23.html
Breast cancer
West et al (2013) Multifocal breast cancer in young women with prolonged contact between their breasts and their cellular phones. http://1.usa.gov/1yFRFBH
Brain tumor incidence trends
Inskip et al (2010) Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States. http://1.usa.gov/1DXyCGR
Zada et al (2012) Incidence trends in the anatomic location of primary malignant brain tumors in the United States: 1992-2006. http://1.usa.gov/1tRnRPJ
Hardell & Carlberg (2015) Increasing rates of brain tumours in the Swedish National Inpatient Register & the Causes of Death Register. http://bit.ly/1aDHJm
Devocht (2016) Inferring the 1985–2014 impact of mobile phone use on selected brain cancer subtypes using Bayesian structural time series and synthetic controls. http://bit.ly/2jJlbZu corrigendum (2017): http://bit.ly/2Cuq2nU
Hardell & Carlberg (2017) Mobile phones, cordless phones and rates of brain tumors in different age groups in the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Swedish Cancer Register during 1998-2015. http://bit.ly/H-C2017
Also see: http://www.saferemr.com/2015/05/brain-tumor-rates-are-rising-in-us-role.html.
Mechanisms
Ruediger (2009) Genotoxic effects of RF EMF. http://1.usa.gov/1gzLuX3
Behari (2010) Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure. http://1.usa.gov/1jeogrO
Juutilainen et al (2011) Review of possible modulation-dependent biological effects of radiofrequency fields. http://1.usa.gov/1eQUXJ3
Volkow et al (2011) Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. http://1.usa.gov/IHmW2W
Pall (2013) EMFs act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. http://1.usa.gov/VulzLm
Dasdag & Akdag (2015) The link between RFs emitted from wireless technologies & oxidative stress. http://1.usa.gov/1X9GfT6
Yakymenko et al (2016) Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. http://bit.ly/2qCGM4F
Barnes & Greenenbaum (2016) Some effects of weak magnetic fields on biological systems: RF fields can change radical concentrations and cancer cell growth rates. http://bit.ly/1WvQGiY
Nikiforov et al (2016) On a possible mechanism of the effect of microwave radiation on biological macromolecules (Russian language). http://bit.ly/2uR71r4
Tamrin et al (2016) Electromagnetic fields and stem cell fate: When physics meets biology. http://bit.ly/2b6Ht3y
Terzi et al (2016) The role of electromagnetic fields in neurological disorders. http://1.usa.gov/1SVOa2g
Havas (2017) When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer? http://bit.ly/2DssMS2
Reproductive Health Effects
LaVignera et al (2011) Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. http://1.usa.gov/1eQXwuv
Aldad et al (2012) Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 Mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. http://1.usa.gov/18cGEwK
Divan et al (2012) Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. http://1.usa.gov/1iu5qPn
Adams et al (2014) Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. http://bit.ly/1pUnmDq
Houston et al (2016) The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function. http://bit.ly/2cJJ2pE
Also see: http://www.saferemr.com/2015/09/effect-of-mobile-phones-on-sperm.html and http://www.saferemr.com/2014/06/joint-statement-on-pregnancy-and.html.
Le Dr Hottinger est membre de plusieurs associations pour la recherche et le traitement du cancer, une activité très lucrative. On a essayé d'identifier la source de financement de ces associaitons, par exemple l'European Society for Medical Oncology - plus de sources de financement par les entreprises pharmaceutiques?
http://www.esmo.org/About-Us/How-We-Work/ESMO-Funding/2016-Funding-Sources -
Est-ce qu'on peut pardonner les spécialistes comme le Dr Hottinger pour être trop occupé de faire attention aux études publiées par exemple par le Dr Lennart Hardell, qui montrent une augmentation de l'incidence des tumeurs cérébrales? On voulait envoyer au Dr Hottinger la liste de ces études (voir ci.dessous).
Le Dr Hottinger minimise aussi les risques pour la santé de la technologie 5G. Il n'est probablement pas au courant de l'Appel des centaines de scientifiques, médecins et experts du monde entier sur les effets sur la santé de la 5G.
On peut critiquer une publication populaire comme l'Illustré pour avoir cité seulement l'avis d'un tel expert comme le Dr Hottinger à l'occasion de la Journée Mondiale Contre le Cancer. La veille, le même magazine a publié un article "Les avancées médicales sur le cancer" : "Trois professeurs spécialisés décryptent l’état des recherches pour les cancers les plus répandus en Suisse" : sein, poumon et prostate, ne parlant que du traitement de ces cancers : chirurgie, radiothérapie, chimiothérapie, hormonothérapie et immunothérapie, tous des traitements qui enrichissent l'industrie du cancer - sans aucune mention de la prévention. Le mauvais usage d'un téléphone mobile, en le tenant en contact avec la peau, dans un soutien-gorge par exemple, peut jouer un rôle dans l'apparence d'un cancer du sein. Quel professionnel de santé nous rappelle des usages sécuritaires des téléphones portables?
Il est temps que nous nous réveillons et interpeller les médias et surtout les experts, pour qu'ils racontent la vérité sur de graves problèmes de santé publique. Oui, "Distinguons le vrai du faux!"
Études de recherche sur les radiations de téléphones cellulaires clés compilées par
Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley
http://www.saferemr.com
October 6, 2017
Note: This is not intended to be a comprehensive list.
National Toxicology Program (2016) Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD Rats (Whole Body Exposure). http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/06/23/055699 (see http://bit.ly/NTPsaferemr)
National Toxicology Program Draft Technical Reports – 2 February 2018
TR-595: NTP Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation (Rats)
TR-596: NTP Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation (Mice)
Tumor risk review papers
Myung et al (2009) Mobile phone use and risk of tumors: a meta-analysis. http://1.usa.gov/12wBOmd
Khurana et al (2009) Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including long-term epidemiologic data. http://1.usa.gov/1jel7s0
Levis et al (2011) Mobile phones and head tumours: the discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epi studies-how do they arise. http://1.usa.gov/1gzK8vl
Levis et al (2012) Mobile phones and head tumours: a critical analysis of case-control epi studies. http://bit.ly/1rA9aTM
WHO (2013) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 102: Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. http://bit.ly/10oIE3o
Morgan et al (2015) Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (Review). http://1.usa.gov/1EqL1DF
Wang Y, Guo X (2016) Meta-analysis of association between mobile phone use and glioma risk. http://bit.ly/2o1dVcn
Bortkiewicz et al (2017) Mobile phone use and risk of intracranial tumors and salivary gland tumors - A meta-analysis. http://bit.ly/2nVJC5d
Prasad et al (2017) Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes. http://bit.ly/cellphonebraintumor
Carlberg, Hardell (2017) Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford Hill viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation. http://bit.ly/2p1ovBU
Also see Long-Term Cell Phone Use Increases Brain Tumor Risk
Tumor risk studies
Interphone Study Group (2010) Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile phone use: results of the Interphone international case-control study. http://1.usa.gov/IBm2nJ
Interphone Study Group (2011) Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. http://1.usa.gov/18CRSNA
Aydin et al (2011) Mobile phone use & brain tumors in children & adolescents: a multi-center case-control study. http://1.usa.gov/1baLADg
Hardell et al (2013) Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use. http://1.usa.gov/1c7WF4T
Hardell et al (2013) Pooled analysis of case-control studies on acoustic neuroma diagnosed 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 and use of mobile and cordless phones. http://1.usa.gov/1iu2ORM
Coureau et al (2014) Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study. http://bit.ly/1DWgzRi
Grell et al (2016) The intracranial distribution of gliomas in relation to exposure from mobile phones: Analyses from the INTERPHONE Study. http://bit.ly/2emIZjz
Acoustic neuroma risk and cell phone use studies
Also see: http://www.saferemr.com/2016/05/should-cellphones-have-warning-labels_23.html
Breast cancer
West et al (2013) Multifocal breast cancer in young women with prolonged contact between their breasts and their cellular phones. http://1.usa.gov/1yFRFBH
Brain tumor incidence trends
Inskip et al (2010) Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States. http://1.usa.gov/1DXyCGR
Zada et al (2012) Incidence trends in the anatomic location of primary malignant brain tumors in the United States: 1992-2006. http://1.usa.gov/1tRnRPJ
Hardell & Carlberg (2015) Increasing rates of brain tumours in the Swedish National Inpatient Register & the Causes of Death Register. http://bit.ly/1aDHJm
Devocht (2016) Inferring the 1985–2014 impact of mobile phone use on selected brain cancer subtypes using Bayesian structural time series and synthetic controls. http://bit.ly/2jJlbZu corrigendum (2017): http://bit.ly/2Cuq2nU
Hardell & Carlberg (2017) Mobile phones, cordless phones and rates of brain tumors in different age groups in the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Swedish Cancer Register during 1998-2015. http://bit.ly/H-C2017
Also see: http://www.saferemr.com/2015/05/brain-tumor-rates-are-rising-in-us-role.html.
Mechanisms
Ruediger (2009) Genotoxic effects of RF EMF. http://1.usa.gov/1gzLuX3
Behari (2010) Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure. http://1.usa.gov/1jeogrO
Juutilainen et al (2011) Review of possible modulation-dependent biological effects of radiofrequency fields. http://1.usa.gov/1eQUXJ3
Volkow et al (2011) Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. http://1.usa.gov/IHmW2W
Pall (2013) EMFs act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. http://1.usa.gov/VulzLm
Dasdag & Akdag (2015) The link between RFs emitted from wireless technologies & oxidative stress. http://1.usa.gov/1X9GfT6
Yakymenko et al (2016) Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. http://bit.ly/2qCGM4F
Barnes & Greenenbaum (2016) Some effects of weak magnetic fields on biological systems: RF fields can change radical concentrations and cancer cell growth rates. http://bit.ly/1WvQGiY
Nikiforov et al (2016) On a possible mechanism of the effect of microwave radiation on biological macromolecules (Russian language). http://bit.ly/2uR71r4
Tamrin et al (2016) Electromagnetic fields and stem cell fate: When physics meets biology. http://bit.ly/2b6Ht3y
Terzi et al (2016) The role of electromagnetic fields in neurological disorders. http://1.usa.gov/1SVOa2g
Havas (2017) When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer? http://bit.ly/2DssMS2
Reproductive Health Effects
LaVignera et al (2011) Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. http://1.usa.gov/1eQXwuv
Aldad et al (2012) Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 Mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. http://1.usa.gov/18cGEwK
Divan et al (2012) Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. http://1.usa.gov/1iu5qPn
Adams et al (2014) Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. http://bit.ly/1pUnmDq
Houston et al (2016) The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function. http://bit.ly/2cJJ2pE
Also see: http://www.saferemr.com/2015/09/effect-of-mobile-phones-on-sperm.html and http://www.saferemr.com/2014/06/joint-statement-on-pregnancy-and.html.
by Meris Michaels
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire
Remarque : Seul un membre de ce blog est autorisé à enregistrer un commentaire.